Words are powerful things and the same can be said for pithy two to three word designations of certain phenomena. A week or so ago I came up with the term ‘institutional narcissism.’ I would like to be able to say that I invented the term. The truth is slightly different. Someone else used the expression in an online conversation, without defining precisely what they meant. I went away and thought about the implications of the words and then fitted my thoughts and ideas around its possible meaning. Something similar has happened to me with another expression which has been current for a couple of years in the States. The expression is Religious Trauma Syndrome (RTS).
Why am I attracted to the term which I first met today (Friday)? I find it helpful because without any further explanation it is allowing us to suggest that religion and religious ideas can in some situations cause harm. This is counter-intuitive and it goes against our long-held assumption that religion is inevitably a benign force. As one involved for a long time in the world of religious abuse, I have of course known for a long time that such a notion is a false one. Just because there are examples of truth, goodness and beauty in the religious systems that we encounter in our world, we also have to be armed with the thought that religions can sometimes do harm. RTS helps us to think about it.
The author of the study that gives rise to our helpful descriptive phrase is Dr Marlene Winnell. Much of what I have to say here about RTS is taken straight from an article on the website https://www.rawstory.com. The article contains useful references to earlier literature and articles on this theme. My reading of the first lines of the article hit me with a strong sense of synchronicity when I started to read it on Friday morning. It begins with personal testimony of how the author, seeking help for bulimia from religious leaders, was expected as a teenager to solve the problem with the help of prayer and faith alone. By some extraordinary coincidence I received today a phone call from a woman in the Midlands who had also suffered at the hands of a Pentecostal congregation seeking to ‘heal’ her eating disorder.
Marlene presents us with many examples of the pastoral situations she has dealt with as a counsellor where individuals have been badly affected by damaging or toxic beliefs. We are familiar with all of these from earlier posts. She first focuses on the effect of teachings concerning hell and damnation especially as they impact small children. The film that circulated widely among evangelical believers called Thief in The Night had an enormous effect. Children who watched it would wake in the night screaming because of the raw fear aroused by the themes of the film -Armageddon and damnation. The undeveloped brains of children were not able to process the horrors and the trauma of the film. The effect of having to internalise the message that all the viewers were wicked and destined for hell was highly traumatic.
The long-term message that many children have been left with after a fundamentalist upbringing is to have a profound sense of worthlessness. Being told to obey the will of God at every turn can easily sap any sense of self-determination. The authoritarian culture of many of churches call members into a state of passive acceptance of obedience to what the leaders tell them. At the same time, it is made very hard or impossible to escape the clutches of the group. Leaving an authoritarian group is possible only by paying a very high price, including the loss of family and all other support networks. The mental adjustments needed to escape are also quite difficult to put into effect. As with cultic groups the churches that demand total obedience have created in the followers a rigid system of processing thoughts. It hard to see the world in anything other than binary categories – right-wrong or black-white.
RTS as a concept is helpful to enable us to identify those who emerge from religious groups as suffering from a state quite similar to PTSD. Winnell suggests that a therapist needs to have some insight into the syndrome so that at the very least there is understanding of the kinds of words or situations that can set off painful ‘triggering’. Even more important it is right for the sufferer of RTS to be protected from other well-meaning Christians who may also not understand the nature of the traumas formerly endured. Bible texts may be a long way from what is therapeutically required.
Winnell’s insights into RTS fit well into the assumptions of this blog. Potential harm by religious leaders is not only to be found among those who exploit power to prey sexually and emotionally on followers. A wider problem exists in that there are within the Christian tradition some potentially harmful and damaging ideas. Young adults who self-harm and suffer from chronic depression as the result of a life-time of religious indoctrination and chronic fear are not good advertisements for the religion of Jesus Christ. Tragically it is still considered by some Christians as ‘sound’ to teach the horrors of hell and the need to use violence against even infants. No, we have moved on from a casual acceptance of slavery and the devaluation of women and children precisely because we have come closer to understand the inner essence of Christ’s teaching. It took Christians 1800 years to see that slavery was evil and barbaric and still longer to outlaw the thrashing of children. But we have done these things, bitterly opposed by some Christians, because the law of compassion and love compels us to act in this way. For centuries, women, children and slaves experienced crushing trauma because ‘good’ Christian people were prepared to tolerate this treatment. Today we stand up to oppose all that is cruel and whenever and wherever we encounter trauma being administered in the name of a version of the Christian faith. Surviving Church is proud to be among those who seek to counteract Religious Trauma Syndrome.
For those with a longer attention span, here is a link to Dr Winnell’s article on RTS
https://www.babcp.com/Review/RTS-Trauma-from-Leaving-Religion.aspx
I’m not sure if I’m able to post links on here, but if not, googling the subject and Stephen’s work here is instructive.
Thank you Steve for the reference and Stephen for the blog.
Dr Winnell’s articles on RTS should be required reading for everyone!
“our long-held assumption that religion is inevitably a benign force”. My goodness, Stephen, where did you get that from?
Don’t panic, Leslie! He’s distinguishing between “religion” and faith! Our religious structures and habits, no pun intended, are often responsible for abuse. It’s what this blog us about.
No EA, I was just astonished that Stephen could think that the idea that religion and religious ideas could be harmful was counter-intuitive to what people normally felt – “the long-held assumption that religion is inevitably a benign force”. Goodness me, in the week of Anjem Choudary’s release? I don’t think people think that at all, nor have they done for a long time.
😀
The trauma, in RTS, appears in part at least, to come from being shattered. It’s shattering to discover that the people we trusted were lying to us. It’s devastating to find that The ideas we believed in from childhood were not, after all, flawless. And then the community we served with all our hearts, gave our all for, turns out at best to be a weak parody of a dysfunctional family.
That’s the trauma bit, some of it anyway.
For my part, the worst bit is regretting deeply having fallen for it. Call me naive perhaps, or in a minority, but I fundamentally believed my religion was wholly good, not just for me but for those around me.
My experience was that it wasn’t wholly good really almost from the get go. Being female. And clever and inclined to ask questions. I was second class anyway, and not really wanted as I was. If I had been submissive perhaps! But bloody minded and plain spoken? Noooo! So basically, I wasn’t what was wanted. I was only good for making babies and scones, but I was single and worked long hours. I’m married now, but not until my mid thirties. I’m afraid I kinda thought everyone was out of step but me! 😀
Too right EA! ‘Questions’ and ‘clever’: not welcome qualities in my experience either. Still, now we know
When I was a university chaplain I used to advise students never to join any group that wasn’t happy with them asking questions. Hostility to questions is a good indicator of controlling behaviour.
Sadly, I’ve sometimes found C of E hierarchy also to resist questions.
Oh, amen to that – your first paragraph anyway – I don’t have enough experience of the C of E to comment though if what some of you are saying I have a lot to learn.
Oh gosh, yes. Someone who may be your intellectual equal is terribly challenging to some senior church people. And some men never get over whether they fancy you or not! Just to spell it out, if “not”, and hey, that’s ok, but if you’re female, you get ignored if not fanciable! Well, by some.
Steve, I can identify with that. Hope you are in a better place now.
Thanks Janet! A work in progress, but good
That’s good to hear.
As with any syndrome, we have considered symptoms and signs in some depth. Perhaps we should next consider treatments and prognosis?
Might Judith Lewis Herman’s model of Trauma and Recovery be a good place to start?
Good call JayKay8