Asbury ‘Revival’. What might be happening?

Many readers of this blog will be observers of an episode in Kentucky which has been dubbed the Asbury Revival.  Asbury is the home of a small Christian university, and its chapel is the site of a continuous act of worship which has been going on for a fortnight.  People have been travelling from all over the States, and beyond, to attend this service where the claim is that God is working a revival which will spread soon to other places all over the world.  In some ways it resembles the Toronto Blessing.  There are significant differences, the main one being that Asbury has not thrown up yet any named leaders.  Toronto Airport Chapel where the earlier ‘revival’ took place in 1994, was ably led by professional clergy who coordinated the events for several months.

Revivals are complicated things to assess, and part of me was hoping that this Asbury event would quickly fizzle into obscurity before I had to say anything or even think about it.  Then one of the Surviving Church readers sent me an email asking me directly what I thought might be going on.  I answered him fairly quickly but, in the process of doing so, I found my mind generating ideas and thoughts which I find worth sharing with my wider readership.

As long-term readers of this blog will know, I have some personal history of exposure to charismatic events and teaching.  Back in the early 1980s I would say that I identified with aspects of charismatic spirituality.  This fed into several years of an active healing ministry with my wife.  Over a period, I was led to write two books on the topic of healing and address meetings around the country.  Something changed for me in the 1990s when many Christians who openly identified with charismatic styles of theology seemed to insist, increasingly, on a hard-edged style of theology.  I could not follow or identify with this.  I have, from my undergraduate days, found what I describe as the Bible proof text method of doing theology a dishonest and frankly incomprehensible way of discovering the mystery of God.  The opening up that the charismatic styles of prayer had taught me, and which allowed me to share deeper insights, could not be sustained in the presence of Christians whose main concern was to establish whether I was ‘sound’.  By the standards of a card-carrying conservative Christian, I did not pass this test of soundness.

Returning to the phenomenon of Ashbury and the revival that is believed to be taking place, I begin with a number of observations.  The first thing to note is that, in the chapel where the revival is supposed to be happening, there is a dominating preponderance of young people. Of course we would expect this in a university chapel but the bulk of the visitors, of which there are many, are also young. In common with the flag-ship revival churches up and down Britain, we find an apparent resonance between such churches and the emotional and spiritual needs of the young.  The second factual observation I make is the style of music.   I am not sure how to describe the dominating style of music that inevitably appears at a revival event.   Much of what I have listened to on YouTube seems to belong to a slow repetitive style, where there is a strong preference for a minor key.  The distinct reflective mode of this music style helps to further a distinctive mood which seems to enthral the audience.  The appeal does not seem to wane, even over long periods of time.  In my continuing attempt to be as objective as possible, I note that this style of music, culturally speaking, does not fit in with the taste of many older people – the over 35 cohort.  Whatever the spiritual significance of Asbury may prove to be, there is clearly also a strong cultural dimension at work.  If this is a real revival, the cynic might suggest that the Holy Spirit is only interested in working among middle-class Americans of student age.

I have on this blog, in the past, offered my observations on the way that conservative/revivalist Christianity seems normally to be far more accessible to the student-age population than to older Christians.  No doubt someone has done some research on why this should be from the cultural/psychological perspective.  I do not know where such research may be written up, so my remarks here have to be rooted in what I have observed over a lifetime of what goes on in churches of all kinds.  My summary claim, based on my observations of Christian life, is that there is something spiritually genuine at the heart of some so-called revivals, including this one.  Nevertheless, it is not the universal panacea for a declining Church in our culture.  It is unrealistic, indeed impertinent, to expect all Christians across the world to recognise in events like Asbury a full embrace of Christian truth as they have known it. The Christian phenomenon, as it manifests itself across the world, is too varied and too diverse to be wrapped up in one single cultural manifestation.  We would be guilty of cultural and spiritual imperialism to claim such a thing.

I have used the word ‘genuine’ to describe what is going on at Asbury University.  I want to explain how, from my point of view, it contains something to teach all of us.  I have expressed a certain number of qualifying caveats to my welcome of the idea of an Asbury revival, but I want now to consider the potential positives.  I begin with some words of Jesus when he said something to the effect of ‘unless you become as little children, you cannot enter the Kingdom of Heaven’.  I have, with countless other preachers, struggled with the meaning of these words.  There is probably no single meaning, but Jesus may be recognising something about the way children apprehend reality much more directly than those of mature age.  Christians of student age, the ones now experiencing revival in Kentucky, seem closer to this capacity to experience a primal spiritual awareness than the older among us. To use the analogy of the onion, older people have far more layers to strip away than the young.  I am wondering whether the ability of ‘gospel music’ to promote stillness and spiritual awareness among some of the young is something we need to understand far better.  Might it not be that this style of music is allowing many young people to regress to the ‘childlike’, even naïve, awareness of God by children that Jesus commended?   This is something that the older among us find increasingly difficult to do.

In my days of studying the phenomenon of Christian healing in the 80s and 90s, I was puzzled by the way that, while ‘miracles’ happened from time to time, there was no way that, from the outside, one could predict who was going to receive healing and who not.  What I observed was that prayer for healing was a worthwhile activity which was sometimes answered by transforming events.  Without going into detail, there was one ingredient that could always be found in every healing episode.  Christians call this ingredient faith.  I use this word rather tentatively as it has gathered to itself a number of connotations which I believe are unhelpful.  I, for one, want to link it back to the childlike primal reaching out to the other, in an attitude of hope and expectation.  This is what Jesus seems to have commended.  It is the sentiment that one hopes to be at the heart of the Asbury revival.  Those who experience this link, this momentary reconnection with God, will find something that lasts, maybe even for a lifetime. 

Will the revival last?  My answer is affected by what I see of the history of revivals.  The power of revival events seems to be hard to maintain.   The energy in them seems to dissipate.  Worse still, the spontaneity of revival is so often destroyed because the unholy juggernauts of institutions appear.  These are the ones that try to attach every new spiritual movement to a money-making machine.  Also, the new experience of ‘faith’ discovered by many individuals, is forcibly diverted into another sort of faith.  This is the one that requires those affected to assent to doctrinal formulae which may have little connection to what they have experienced. This unholy process is vividly described in the book by Reuben Alves, Protestantism and Repression. Asbury may well leave something behind, even if not what Christian leaders want to see – full churches and financial strength for the church institutions.  There may be clusters of new spiritual power inside the hearts of men and women around the world.  This comes as the result of having been for a short time in a new active communication with the transcendent power we call God.

  My hopes for Asbury are tempered with a realistic understanding of the human capacity to destroy spiritual energy because of power games, control and money.  Many of my readers will have shared my dismay at the way institutions so often corrupt those who are part of them.  If there is something alive and spiritually genuine about what is being experienced at this small Christian university in Kentucky, we pray that it may survive these dangers of being controlled by people who are concerned only for their own purposes.  We will see over a period of time whether the parts of it that seem to be genuine, are indeed of God.  If they are, we trust that they will be allowed to remain of God.

About Stephen Parsons

Stephen is a retired Anglican priest living at present in Cumbria. He has taken a special interest in the issues around health and healing in the Church but also when the Church is a place of harm and abuse. He has published books on both these issues and is at present particularly interested in understanding how power works at every level in the Church. He is always interested in making contact with others who are concerned with these issues.

7 thoughts on “Asbury ‘Revival’. What might be happening?

  1. What is the fruit of this revival? Is there a greater love for God and a consequent pouring out of concern and care for others? If so, great!

    For many years I was involved in musical worship, starting with choirs and formal singing and ending with bands and informal worship. Some of the greatest experiences (and some of the worst) were generated in the midst of such music. Sometimes it felt like heaven was around us, as if the Presence of God were palpable. I often wondered what it would be like to do this 24-7 and how incredible that would be.

    I’m still thankful for those experiences. However I do ponder whether and to what extent they made us better people, more loving. And how authentic was it really? Some of the sensations I experienced were very similar to those described under the description “autonomous sensory meridian response”. I recommend them, and certainly even if they were nothing to do with God’s nearness, no harm done either per se.

    However, as Stephen caveats us above, it’s often not long before human spirits decide to cash in. As with all things sacred, we often spoil them by taking them for ourselves and using them to manipulate others. I await with interest how the Asbury revival pans out.

  2. I’m a product of the Jesus Movement, a revival which began in the late 60s and continued into the 1970s. It was primarily among young people and hippies, but spread much wider than that. It would generally fit the picture you describe, Stephen: ‘Christians of student age, the ones now experiencing revival in Kentucky, seem closer to this capacity to experience a primal spiritual awareness than the older among us.’

    Do we know what age groups were primarily affected by the Great Awakening in New England, the 18th C Wesleyan Revival in England, the early 20th C Welsh Revival, and the 1950s Hebridean Revival? I don’t recall reading that any one age group was particularly affected by those, but I’m no expert.

  3. Perhaps it is a once in a life time dynamic spiritual awareness that happens in a culture of youthful excitement. I hope and pray that the genuine love praise and healing will become a part of their lives however it developes.

  4. I had not heard of the ongoing phenomenon at Asbury University and have spent a little time following this up on YouTube and other internet resources.

    I agree that Stephen does indeed present a thoughtful appraisal of this (benign?) phenomenon.

    What I have not seen, is any discussion of the sociology such group events.

    I was interested to learn of the history of past “revivals” at the College/University

    https://www.asbury.edu/academics/resources/library/archives/history/revivals/

    I assume that as a Christian University with links to the long Wesleyan Holiness tradition and history in the USA, it also draws its students and teachers from largely white churchgoing families in the Southern State of Kentucky.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holiness_movement

    Is this phenomenon itself not the result of the expectation of such an event because of the theological “mindset” of the institution and its staff and students?

    1. Hi Chris. Judging by the video footage, there’s a pretty good racial mix present at the Asbury Revival. And it’s now spreading to other college campuses.

      Having watched a little on YouTube, it does remind me of the Jesus Movement, which eventually spread around the world. I remember the Jesus Movement with some nostalgia; it’s when my own faith came alive. I know a number of others who can date their own faith back to that era.

      These movements are always mixed, of course, and the more widely this one spreads the more mixed it will become. But on the whole, the Jesus Movement did a lot of good – though it did also spawn a few cults.

  5. Ever since reading The Great Volcano by David Bentley Taylor (1965) about the ongoing Christian revival in the far East, I have thought of the church as being like a volcano. It slumbers for much of the time, with perhaps an occasional tremor. Every now and then, it bursts into spectacular life and amazing power and you’d be foolish to ignore it. Then it dies down, and what was so hot becomes cold and hard again. A lava field is not a place you would expect to find life, but surprisingly vegetation does spring up there despite all odds.

Comments are closed.