by Anon

The Lucius Letters: Chapter Two
Damon is an apprentice devil tasked with learning to undermine and weaken the Church of England and wider Anglicanism. Lucius is a senior devil mentoring apprentices overseeing the work on all denominations. Lucius refers to the Church of England as the ‘English Patient’. Lucius is particularly keen to encourage the Church of England’s peculiar ecclesionomics, bloated ecclesiocracy and unaccountable episcocrats. Lucius draws on C. S. Lewis’ Screwtape Letters, published in 1942. These letters are published by Lucius for the benefit of new apprentices. – Lucius.
Mutual Flourishing
Dear Lucius
I am getting very concerned about some of the press releases I keep seeing from a handful of Church of England dioceses. These seem to indicate that women clergy work quite well with male clergy who don’t actually think women can be proper clergy. But in some pictures from these dioceses, the women clergy look ever so happy, and say things like how lovely and nice their bishop is, even though that same bishop clearly doesn’t think women can be proper clergy. I’m worried that the overt discrimination is getting camouflaged by a veneer of politeness and a heavy cloak of niceness. We should be able to expose the Church of England for discrimination, but they seem to be getting away with by smiling a lot and talking about ‘mutual flourishing’. How can we expose this duplicity?
Your Servant, Damon
Dear Damon,
You honestly don’t need to worry. The sacramental efficacy of women priests and bishops is clearly doubted by these proponents of ‘traditionalist’ views, and in no uncertain terms. A recent Church of England report said this:
“The basis of…objection to women’s ordination is the authority and unity of the Church. The Church of England is part of the one holy catholic Church of God and that imposes limits on what it can and can’t decide unilaterally. Extending the historic threefold order to women constitutes a major doctrinal change and thus, whilst it may be the way the Spirit is calling the Church, it is an action that the Church of England does not have the unilateral authority to undertake”.
It is hilarious to cite ordination as the factor in the “authority and unity” of the One Holy Catholic Church. The official teaching of the Roman Catholic Church on the sanctity of life – conception, contraception and so forth – and the proper ordering of family life are major tenets of Catholicism. The Church of England departed from such positions decades ago – “decide(ing) unilaterally” – that managing the size of a family through artificial means (i.e., contraception) was not wrong or sinful. Roman Catholic orthodoxy disagrees.
Traditionalist Anglicans are just liberals pimped up in liturgical bling. They choose to ignore many major Roman Catholic doctrines, yet they accept others. They are fully signed up to Pick-and-Mix Anglicanism. They just don’t like to admit it.
The bishops are like some modern-day King Solomon rabbit caught in the headlights. Faced with a moral dilemma, such as what to do with two women arguing over one baby and who is the real mother, the bishops fudge it. They’ll recommend joint custody or try and broker some coparenting arrangement. They’d call that ‘mutual flourishing’ too. Why make a hard moral choice when you can fudge the issues and delay a difficult decision?
Trying to impose ‘mutual flourishing’ makes no moral sense. It would be like forcing somebody to sign up for a peace treaty that they objected to and then telling them that they then had to sign another document saying they were happy with the terms of the imposed truce, even though they had resisted the treaty. And if they weren’t happy, they’d be told they’d end up with even less…so please pose for the camera next to the grinning man who doesn’t think you should be in the picture wearing a dog collar, and smile nicely!
The important thing to remember, Damon, is that the public don’t buy this for a second. That’s why the congregations who are against women clergy are so careful not to mention this on their websites or on their notice boards. The phrase ‘mutual flourishing’ is only meant to stop people inside the Church of England arguing more, and somebody actually making a clear moral decision.
This is a huge fillip to us – and to the One whose Name Must Not Be Spoken. The Church of England has compromised on every important moral matter in recent times. On sexuality, gender, equal marriage and even the remarriage of divorcees, the Church of England won’t ever give a clear moral lead. They then just dress this up in silly phrases like ‘mutual flourishing’ which are imposed without consent.
Frankly, the Church of England does such a great job of undermining itself, and slowly losing the trust and confidence of its people and the wider population, you need do nothing other than sit back and watch them destroy themselves.
So, Damon, there’s no need to worry. The best thing to do with the English Patient is let them carry on releasing glib press releases with smiling women clergy next to grinning male clergy who don’t really believe the clergywomen should be in the picture at all. Just leave the church leaders to their vain PR and comms strategies.
Keep stroking their egos. The church leaders think they are running a VIABLE Church – a Very Important And Big Long-term Enterprise. But in truth, your English Patient is just suffering from long-term cognitive impairment. So the gaps between fantasy and reality keep growing and will cause your patient to gradually unravel. Trust me. You just need to be patient.
Your Mentor, Lucius.
Many thanks again, but this Screwtape exchange suggests that the Church of England is something in opposition to Hades. I am not so sure. Given some recent commentary, both above and below the line, in at least one ‘Anglican’ blog on the question of whether genocide is being committed in a certain occupied territory in the Middle East – views which may help to explain the almost complete indifference of General Synod to what has been the best documented genocide in World history (as well as its indifference to nuclear escalation in Europe) – it seems to me that the Church of England is not only *not* in opposition to Hades, but has sadly become a branch office of it.
Is Synod a branch office of the Council (in regard to any issue even closer to home)?
Has the system shaped by the Council led to a worsening in personal conduct standards by some average individual bishops?
That it’s still possible for a conservative bishop to stand up to the Council is illustrated by the proposal by the bishop of Guildford to get LLF back onto the rails where it should have been, since the Council allowed / induced the archbishops to sabotage it by evading procedure.
BISHOP DAVID MCCLAY-of the Belfast based DOWN AND DROMORE DIOCESE-is the kind of senior Anglican leader who needs to face very severe punishment. Roman Catholicism has slowly learnt about an absolute need to ‘expel the immoral’ senior leader.
Senior leaders, who protect abusers or fail to protect victim interests, or let kangaroo court justice see innocent people get wrongly punished or ostracised, must in future face very severe sanctions. The media should ask Bishop McClay some serious questions.
Why have you not named the late Canon W G Neely as a predatory child abuser who was shifted from Belfast to Tipperary? Why did you cover up the sinister ill-treatment of senior professional or business people (like James Hardy, Prof Helen Roe, Jill McClelland, Robert Graham)? What are you covering up at Saint Brendan’s Church in Belfast, where yet another ex-New Wine trainee has mysteriously vanished from Down and Dromore Diocese?
A 12 mins online YouTube film posted 30.1.22 celebrates mission success and growth at St Brendans. ‘Olive Tree Media’ have posted this online film: ‘Karl Faase interviews Joe Turner for Jesus the Game Changer Season 2’. But reference to Joe Turner on parish internet or Facebook sites seems to have long vanished.
There are compelling grounds for the All-Ireland Primate, Archbishop John McDowell, to ask Bishop David McClay [BISHOP DARVO CLAY-FOOT might be a better title) to resign. If David McClay does not resign should Archbishop John McDowell be asked to leave?
Is the scale of abuse being cynically covered up in the Church of Ireland Diocese of Down and Dromore utterly shocking? Why did the witness evidence, of senior professional or business people, not result in a formal inquiry into the cover up of bullying and harassment?
The problems within New Wine and evangelical Anglicanism extend far beyond the Church of England and Canon Mike Pilavachi. There are compelling reasons for Bishop David McClay to be asked to resign in disgrace.
I smiled when I saw the ‘huge fillip’ referenced in this context… I wonder if the Mentor had anyone particular in mind when they wrote this!
Thanks to Lucius for exposing the hypocrisy of ‘mutual flourishing’. It certainly plays into the devils’ hands.